I have owned a Sting TL2000 for 2 years now and it is a fantastic aircraft.  The Sting is easy to handle both in the air and on the ground.  Short field performance is excellent, I operate out of a 350m grass strip. Low speed handling is very good which is important when landing in a short grass field.  Fuel capacity is 80 Lts,  which gives me 5 hours endurance at 90 knots.  The Rotax 912ULS is faultless, the cockpit is surprisingly quiet looks smart and sporty.  Lots of room for 2 adults and not cramped at all.

The performance is equal to larger aircraft with much larger engines but the Rotax only sips away your fuel which is MOGAS!

Nice aeroplane and still enjoying it.

Les James – Nuneaton

“I have toured France a number of times from Normandy to La Baule in the remarkable Sting S3. Not only is it an excellent touring aircraft with generous shoulder and leg room, but the short field performance to take advantage of microlight strips is just superb. I also fly Cessna and Piper aircraft so the frugal fuel consumption using Mogas is a revelation.”

Pete E.

Lancashire

Took early retirement with moderate lump sum . Invested it all in the Sting .

BEST INVESTMENT I EVER MADE !

FISO at Barton reckons it’s the nicest looking aircraft at the airport , and who am I to disagree.

Barry T. in Manchester

I have owned both a STING and also now own the high wing SIRIUS. I changed merely because, prior to a knee replacement operation,  an arthritic knee gave me difficulty getting in and out of the Sting which can be viewed more like a sports car. The Sirius however, being high wing with gull type doors is very easy for the less agile to get in and out of. Both offer excellent visibility and performance. The Sirius has the further advantage of a larger baggage area ideal for touring. (We managed to fit two Brompton folding bikes in!)